The progression that happens throughout the book, starting by exposing problems with past and current forms of money and then showing how Bitcoin solves all of these problems was very well done and honestly impressive. My trust and understanding in Bitcoin and cryptocurrency in general has increase tenfold.However, I couldn't help but notice that he often proposes very contentious arguments like they are fact. His persistent critique of Keynes and his link between the "decline in culture" we have been seeing and the adoption of unsound money sure feels right in the context of the book, but I think they might be a bit of a stretch.Does anyone feel the same way or have resources that contradict some of his points? I'd love to atleast see the other side of the medal before rejecting it altogether. via /r/Bitcoin https://bit.ly/3faxMQz
No comments :
Post a Comment